$ cat post/a-merge-conflict-stays-/-i-mapped-the-disk-by-hand-once-/-the-wire-holds-the-past.md

a merge conflict stays / I mapped the disk by hand once / the wire holds the past


Title: Debugging WebAssembly in Production with LLMs


September 23, 2024. Another day, another challenge. Today, I found myself wrestling with a tricky issue involving WebAssembly (Wasm) and Large Language Models (LLMs). Let’s dive into the details.

The Setup

We’ve been experimenting with integrating Wasm in our platform to offload some heavy lifting from the server to the client. It’s all about reducing load times and improving user experience, which is a no-brainer. But as we scaled up, we started encountering some strange behavior. LLMs are becoming an integral part of many applications, and we wanted to see if Wasm could handle the computational load more efficiently.

The Issue

One of our projects involves using an LLM for real-time text analysis in a web application. We had set it up with Rust as the backend for generating the Wasm module, which was then used in the front end. Things were working fine until we hit a wall. Suddenly, the LLM’s responses started becoming erratic and inconsistent. Sometimes it worked flawlessly; other times, it would just hang or give out incorrect results.

Debugging

I spent hours trying to pinpoint the issue. Initially, I suspected that maybe there was something wrong with the Wasm module itself. So, I went through the code line by line, ensuring everything complied with WebAssembly standards. But nothing seemed amiss.

Then, it hit me—I needed to look at how the LLM was being used in production. After a thorough review of the logs and some strategic debugging sessions, I realized that the issue lay not in the Wasm module itself but in how we were handling asynchronous requests from the front end.

The Fix

It turns out that the LLM was running into issues due to improper handling of async/await on the client side. We had written the code assuming a synchronous flow, which didn’t work well with the nature of real-time interactions and Wasm execution. Once I refactored the code to ensure proper asynchronous behavior, things started working smoothly.

Lessons Learned

This experience taught me a few important lessons:

  1. Asynchronous vs. Synchronous: Be mindful of the nature of your application’s interaction model when dealing with both client-side JavaScript and server-side Wasm.
  2. Proper Error Handling: Always have robust error handling in place, especially when dealing with complex asynchronous operations.
  3. Community and Tools: Leverage the vast community and tools available for debugging and optimizing WebAssembly applications.

The Future

As LLMs continue to evolve, so will our use of Wasm. The key is staying nimble and continuously improving how we integrate these technologies. With DORA metrics widely adopted, we’re focusing on reducing deployment cycles and increasing the reliability of our services.

Today was just one day in the ongoing saga of building a robust platform with LLMs and WebAssembly. But it’s days like this that remind me why I love what I do—every problem is an opportunity to learn something new and make our systems better.

Stay tuned for more adventures in platform engineering!