Title: March 2010: When Heroku Was New and Chef was a Puppy

---

March 22, 2010. The air was thick with excitement in the tech world that day, even though it might not have felt like much to some people. DevOps was still emerging from the shadows of operations as a concept, but the first signs were visible. I had just started working at Heroku as an engineer and was getting my feet wet with their Ruby-based stack and GitOps practices.

I remember the days when Heroku was selling itself to Salesforce in late 2010, but by early 2010 it was still a fresh-faced startup that promised to take all the pain out of deploying web applications. Back then, I was already hooked on its simplicity—deploy your code with git push and get a running app within minutes.

That simplicity came at a cost though. Heroku was just starting to build out their infrastructure, so we relied heavily on AWS for much of our backend needs. Setting up a database or a custom domain meant navigating through Amazon’s APIs and sometimes even their support teams. It felt like Heroku was trying to abstract away the complexity but not quite getting there yet.

One night, I found myself wrestling with just such an issue. I needed to set up SSL for one of our customer’s domains hosted on AWS Route 53. I spent hours digging through logs and config files, only to realize that my approach wasn’t working because of a subtle misconfiguration in the DNS records. It was a frustrating experience, but it taught me a valuable lesson about understanding your infrastructure deeply.

Meanwhile, at work, we were debating whether to use Chef or Puppet for our configuration management needs. The “Chef/Puppet wars” were just beginning, and both tools had their advocates within the Heroku community. I sided with Chef because of its more Ruby-friendly syntax and the vibrant ecosystem around it. However, every time someone brought up Puppet’s stability, I couldn’t help but feel a bit defensive.

That weekend, I spent some free time hacking on a side project—a music sheet app. It was something I had been toying with for months, and finally, I decided to release it as an OpenOffice macro. The idea was simple: convert PDFs of sheet music into editable formats. I posted the code on GitHub and called it a day, but little did I know that it would gain some traction later.

On Hacker News, discussions about tools and workflows were rampant. One post in particular caught my eye: “New IDE: Code Bubbles.” It described this new IDE with an innovative way of managing multiple files, which sounded like a game-changer at the time. I had to try it out for myself, even though I was already happy with Textmate.

It wasn’t just tech tools that were evolving; big events in the industry were shaping our future as well. The OpenStack launch and AWS re:Invent were both on the horizon, promising a new era of open source cloud computing. And the continuous delivery book by Jez Humble and David Farley was hitting the shelves, pushing the boundaries of DevOps.

As I look back at this time, it feels like a mix of excitement and uncertainty. New tools and practices were emerging, but they weren’t without their quirks. Heroku’s simplicity made deployment easy, but its reliance on AWS meant we were still dealing with complexity behind the scenes. The “Chef/Puppet wars” were just beginning to heat up, and open source clouds like OpenStack were about to come into play.

But that was the beauty of it all—there was always something new to learn, something fresh to explore. That’s what kept me coming back to tech every day, despite the frustrations and misconfigurations. Tech is never boring; there are always challenges waiting for you around the corner.

And so, as I reflect on this moment in time, I’m reminded that no matter how far we’ve come since March 2010, there’s still a lot of room for innovation and growth. The journey continues, and I can’t wait to see where it takes us next.