$ cat post/vi-on-a-dumb-term-/-a-timeout-with-no-fallback-/-no-rollback-existed.md
vi on a dumb term / a timeout with no fallback / no rollback existed
Title: WebAssembly: A New Frontier in Server-Side Development
Today marks the 20th of October, a date that’s been on my calendar as a reminder to reflect on our journey over the past year. As an engineer and platform manager navigating the ever-changing landscape of tech, I find myself often looking back at what we’ve achieved and what still lies ahead.
In recent months, WebAssembly has emerged from its initial hype cycle into a serious contender for server-side development. The ability to run compiled code in a sandboxed environment without sacrificing performance is too good to be ignored. We’ve been experimenting with it on one of our projects, trying to see if we can offload some computationally intensive tasks and improve the responsiveness of our services.
The Experiment
One of the most interesting aspects of WebAssembly (Wasm) is its potential for serverless-like functions running at full speed. Our project involves a lot of data processing, which was traditionally handled by Node.js or Python scripts. We decided to give Wasm a try and see if we could compile some of these scripts into WebAssembly modules.
The Setup
We started by setting up a small demo application using Emscripten, a toolchain for compiling C/C++ code to WebAssembly. Our first target was a simple function that performs vector calculations. We compiled the code and integrated it with our backend service via an HTTP endpoint. Initially, everything seemed rosy—our tests passed, and we saw decent performance gains.
The Hurdles
However, as soon as we started using this setup in production, we hit a few bumps. One of the biggest challenges was handling asynchronous calls from Wasm to JavaScript. Wasm doesn’t have built-in support for JavaScript’s event loop, so we had to write custom glue code to handle these transitions smoothly. It wasn’t straightforward and required a good understanding of both Wasm and JavaScript.
Another issue we faced was memory management. Allocating and deallocating memory in Wasm can be tricky, especially when dealing with large datasets. We had some leaks and needed to optimize our memory handling significantly.
The Outcome
Despite these challenges, the performance improvements were undeniable. Our data processing tasks completed faster, and under load, the service remained stable where it would have otherwise experienced timeouts or crashes.
The Broader Context
Meanwhile, the tech world was buzzing with excitement around AI and LLMs (Large Language Models). ChatGPT had just been released, and everyone was scrambling to understand its implications. We couldn’t help but wonder how Wasm could fit into this new era of intelligent applications. One idea that sparked our interest was using Wasm to run custom models for inference on the edge. This would allow us to reduce latency while keeping costs down.
Lessons Learned
Through this experiment, I’ve learned a few valuable lessons:
- Patience is Key: WebAssembly isn’t yet ready for all server-side scenarios. There are still gaps in tooling and support that need to be addressed.
- Community Matters: The Wasm community is small but growing fast. Engaging with the community early can help you find solutions faster and avoid common pitfalls.
- Performance Is Not Everything: While performance gains are crucial, it’s important not to overlook the complexity added by integrating new technologies.
Looking Forward
As we move into 2023, I’m excited about the potential of WebAssembly. It promises to bridge the gap between server-side and client-side development, offering a more unified approach to building applications. We’ll continue to experiment with it, but for now, our focus is on making sure that whatever technologies we choose are well-suited for the challenges ahead.
Stay tuned for updates as we navigate this new frontier!