$ cat post/a-diff-i-once-wrote-/-a-system-i-built-by-hand-/-the-secret-rotated.md

a diff I once wrote / a system I built by hand / the secret rotated


Title: August 2012: When DevOps Was a New Word in the Industry


Hey there,

It’s been quite some time since I last reflected on my blog, but as August 2012 seems to be a significant month for tech history, let’s dive into it.

A Tale of Two Technologies: Chef and Puppet

Around this time, the DevOps movement was still finding its footing. For us in ops, it felt like we were playing catch-up with development teams that had already started using tools like Jenkins for continuous integration and GitHub for version control. But now, everyone wanted to play along, and the big question was: How do I make my infrastructure as easy to manage as a simple git pull?

I remember spending a good chunk of August 2012 wrestling with both Chef and Puppet. Each had its advocates, and the argument was fierce. Some teams preferred Chef’s Ruby-based DSL because it felt more like writing scripts (and who doesn’t love scripting?), while others swayed towards Puppet’s declarative syntax for its readability and simplicity.

As an ops guy, I found myself spending countless hours debugging recipes that didn’t behave as expected. There were times when the answer was staring me right in the face, but it required a deeper understanding of the underlying infrastructure or a more nuanced configuration than what I initially thought.

The Netflix Chaos Engineering Experiment

One of the most fascinating things going on at the time was Netflix’s Chaos Monkey experiment. The concept of intentionally breaking parts of your system to test resilience wasn’t new, but seeing how Netflix formalized it and shared their experience made me realize that being proactive about failure was a step in the right direction.

I was particularly intrigued by how they used these experiments to ensure that the systems they built were not only robust but also capable of recovering gracefully. The thought of having to intentionally bring down services to test them—now that’s what I call forward-thinking!

OpenStack: A New Hope

Another major event in tech this month was the launch of OpenStack, a cloud computing platform designed from the ground up by some of the best minds in the industry. As someone who had been building and managing private clouds for years using proprietary tools, I couldn’t help but feel both excited and skeptical about what it would mean for the future.

There were concerns about complexity, stability, and whether open-source platforms could truly compete with established players like AWS. But as someone who believed in the power of open source, this was a step towards making cloud computing more accessible to everyone.

A Small Victory: Amazon Glacier

In terms of real work, one small victory I can point to is when my team and I successfully integrated Amazon Glacier into our backup strategy for some critical data. It’s hard to believe now, but at the time, using Glacier felt like a major breakthrough. The ability to store data offsite, with massive scalability and low costs, was something we had been looking for.

We spent weeks setting up the necessary scripts and tests to ensure everything worked smoothly. When it did, there was a sense of relief and pride that our team could now better protect our critical data.

Reflecting on August 2012

Looking back at this time, I see how much has changed in just five years. DevOps is no longer a buzzword; it’s an established practice. OpenStack is still around, but the landscape of cloud computing has evolved beyond anything we could have imagined.

But through all these changes, one thing remains constant: the need for reliable infrastructure and effective management tools. And while I might not be as excited about Chef or Puppet today, those battles back in August 2012 taught me a lot about resilience, flexibility, and the importance of being prepared for the unexpected.

Until next time,

Brandon